I spent the week last week at a workshop on post graduate
supervision. It was both challenging and interesting. On the one hand, we spent
time interrogating our own approaches to supervision - both good and bad, and
on the other hand we spent time learning about the issues which need to be
addressed through the process of supervision. It is not enough to know how - we
must also have a reasonable understanding of why.
Over the last few days, a thought has struck me as a result of
something someone said during the course of discussion. She was talking about
... I am not really clear about what she was getting at, but it made me think. I
am reading a research report by a young researcher in my lab, and I am struck
by the importance of acknowledging the effect we have as scientists on the work
that we do. When I ask a question, I affect the answer. We try to remove
ourselves as a variable whenever we do research and try to make the work
as reproducible as possible, but inevitably, there remains a small
part of us which affects the outcome of the research.
We know this and that is why when an experiment fails so many
students take it personally. Their first response is not that the hypothesis
was wrong, but rather that they
failed. Somebody else could doubtless have done it better. One of the most
important things I can do as a supervisor is to help that student move from the
point
“what did I do wrong?!”
to
“why did the experiment not work in the expected way?”
Just sometimes I think I should ask myself the same question… not “what
did I do wrong?” but “why is this student not working out the way I expected?”
Sometimes the answers open the door to new and unexpected
adventures!
No comments:
Post a Comment